Tips From Tony Blog

Archive for the 'Editorial Opinions' Category

Teens and Predators

Wednesday, February 7th, 2007

A client of mine was concerned because her 17-year-old daughter had posted personal information on MySpace.com, including the home phone number! Here’s what I wrote in response:

I went to Google and looked up “myspace predators” and found this.

The best I can offer you is a few of my own thoughts, after raising kids of my own:

- There are a lot of bad people in the world, and ALL of them are online. They see ignorant, innocent teens and they see easy meat. There is NOTHING you can do to keep her away from her favorite online hangouts if she’s determined - she can just head to the library and dive right back in. MySpace and FaceBook are HUGELY popular with teenagers nowadays - they are the “Lou’s Soda Shoppe” of the modern age. It’s kinda creepy, because you can have a lot of friendlike objects that you never actually MEET, in the flesh. But, it’s the current thing going on, so it’s not going to go away.

I’ve found that the best approach is to be brutally honest about the incredibly high probability of being groomed and then attacked. Those “Have you seen me?” milk cartons and “Amber Alert” signs on the freeway are the most-visible examples of the need to handle this NOW.

If she runs into Mister Predator online, she’s not dealing just with him, she’s dealing with his huge network of buddies who share success-stories, pictures and videos (they constitute great porn for that crowd). He and his peers are constantly honing their techniques together, every single day. Open-hearted, innocent little tootsies are their designated prey.

Here’s what I would do in the same circumstance:

I’d bring her to a neutral space - a nice, high-end restaurant with a private booth. Everybody should dress up and do it up right. The setting will enforce the specialness of the occasion. I’d tell her that this was the most important conversation that you have ever had together up to this point, and that you are not speaking to her as “Parent to Stupid Little Child”, but as “Adult to Adult in Training”. That ALWAYS get their attention. She’ll be in full recording mode from that moment on.

Now, in the next few paragraphs, I’m going to say “I’d recommend saying this or that”, but your daughter should be able to contribute at least fifty percent of the conversation. Don’t just hand down Royal Proclamations from above, and don’t gang up on her. Teenagers hate that! Ask her what she thinks, and LISTEN.

If necessary, designate the Salt Shaker of Truth… As long as one person holds that magical salt-shaker, NOBODY else can talk until it is voluntarily relinquished. It really opens up the conversation, and a lot more truth shows up. If you have to, set a timed, five-minute limit per person.

Now is not the time to say “Because I say so, that’s why!” Open up and be as real as possible. Temporarily, you’re not her parents, you’re fellow adults, remember? That’s the advantage of being on “neutral ground” - Both sides are off of their turf, so that communication can flow more smoothly than usual. It adds a sense of occasion, so that it will be more impressive and memorable for all concerned.


You have ownership of a lot of responsibility for the situation (and you should admit this - she’ll be impressed). You’ve done your best to make sure that the home environment (the “nest”) has been as safe as possible. This would have been a very good thing to do in 1907, but the harshest parts of the world have no respect for the borders of your home nowadays.The problem with ultra-safe upbringings is that they don’t help youngsters to develop “street smarts”, and they become prey if communication fails between the parents and the youngsters.I’d tell her that you are NOT going to throw up a firewall between her and her MySpace buddies. Tell her that you are quite aware of her activities there. Tell her why you snooped, and what your thought-processes were. Tell her that you would rather NOT snoop, and want to redefine your relationship to match her age and level of adulthood.

I would tell her that posting the phone number online is hideously hazardous for YOU, your household and your belongings, and not just for her. It’s NOTHING for a predator to do a reverse-lookup on the phone-number and get a map to your place in under ten seconds. Some folks probably even have the process automated. I could do it in one click. She’s messing with everything that you’ve got, frankly, and she needs to “toughen up” her attitude, fast. Online is not the place to be tender and juicy and available - It’s a place to be tough, cynical and armor-plated.

Tell her that she’s a mature, responsible young adult and that you trust her, and really mean it. Yes, she screwed up briefly, but it’s a blip until something really bad happens, which it hasn’t. It can be changed, and you can enter a new phase of mutual communication. Transform it from a problem to a possibility. Make some new rules for 2007, but make them together, based on mutual agreements. She’s 17, and she can handle more responsibilities, and is more likely to do so, if she gets to make her own rules.


If she doesn’t follow up, and STILL does stuff that jeopardizes your household, then sell her computer. Let the hammer fall, because she didn’t take you seriously enough. She can buy her next computer when she’s got a place of her own. This is life-or-death stuff, not some stupid game.

Tony’s Supercomputer Cluster/Photoshop CS3

Friday, December 22nd, 2006

I got my first taste of using all of our household computers as one, five-processor supercomputer. I suspect that it won’t be my last. I also suspect that YOU’LL be able to harness all of that idle horsepower in your building too, once the new Photoshop ships.

If you are using OS X 10.4 Tiger, there is a wonderful, built-in option that nobody uses except for big universities. If you pull down the blue Apple menu, and go to System preferences, and then click on “Sharing”, there is an “Xgrid” option. Don’t turn it on or anything, because there’s not much point, so far. I just wanted to point it out.

I finally found a way to get some practical use out of it myself, though - It works very well indeed. I have a zillion movie files stored all over the place, and the majority of them are NOT Video iPod-compatible. I just downloaded and purchased VisualHub, which allows you to use every Mac in the building to do the hard work of converting movies to another format.

I have every existing episode of the TV series LOST (without commercials), and I wanted to be able to watch them on a video iPod. I did the conversion once, using my MacBook Pro, and the process took around fifteen hours. Then, I decided to take advantage of Visualhub’s Xgrid option. It couldn’t be simpler to set up, and sure enough, a test run showed that conversion happened more than twice as quickly (I’m guesstimating, by the way).

The MacBook upstairs and my own MacBook Pro were cranking away hard, with fans blasting. I had included my son’s G4 iBook in the mix, but it didn’t help much, just as I had been warned in the VisualHub manual. Non-G5 PowerPC Macs are just not fast enough to help very much.

I don’t expect to do a lot of this sort of work, but I can see a glimmer of excitement for all of those folks with networks of Macs running Adobe products.

PREDICTING THE FUTURE

I can see this topic becoming VERY important to folks using Photoshop, once everybody has shifted to Intel Macs (and a faster network). I have cursed Adobe for a year now, for refusing to come out with an Intel-optimized version of its products. What’s the use of all of that lovely, high-end hardware if you can’t get decent speed out of it? By the way… if you are running Photoshop CS2 on an Intel Mac, make SURE that you are running the 10.4.8 update. Apple evidently put a lot of Photoshop-specific speedups into that version of the operating system.

Based on preliminary reports, Photoshop CS3 beta is able to make use of ALL of the processors that you might have available. This is triple-groovy, folks. Up to this point, every program worth mentioning has behaved in the same, old, worn-out way when confronted with multiple processors. One program can’t get much use out of more than two processors. In fact, those experimental eight-processor Mac Pro towers that folks are playing with aren’t much faster than a four-processor Mac Pro when used in the real world (as opposed to pie-in-the-sky benchmark programs). Up to now, real-world software runs out of steam long before the hardware does.

The missing piece is “multithreading”. I hear that it’s hard work to write a program that makes full use out of all available processors simultaneously, but the benefits are huge. For whatever reason, the folks at Adobe made the decision to concentrate ALL of their efforts on re-writing everything from the ground up. The long-term benefits will be really incredible… for Adobe, for Apple’s sales of big, expensive Macs, and for the folks who use Photoshop as a money-pump for their business.

I will be in San Francisco January 8-12, 2007 for Macworld Expo. I FULLY EXPECT to be able to mess around with Photoshop CS3 on a new, eight–processor Mac tower that I expect Apple to announce that weekend. I also predict that Creative Suite CS3 will eventually support Xgrid, which will be even simpler to use once OS X 10.5 (Leopard) comes out. I’m basing this on the fact that the numbers of processors are going up, and once a program is written to take advantage of multithreading, then it’s staggeringly obvious that more processors are better, and why not use the secretary’s idle iMac down the hall to help with the heavy lifting during lunch, or overnight?

Photoshop CS3: Adobe Spits on Apple

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

Well, I’ve downloaded and installed the Public Beta version of Photoshop CS3 (which also includes Adobe Bridge CS3). Better than that, I’ve also downloaded the FREE video tutorial for Photoshop CS3 Beta, which taught me one thing, very, very clearly:

Adobe really HATES the idea of Apple taking business away from them.

A while back, six programmers at Adobe jumped ship and started working for Apple, and created Aperture, which is one of my favorite programs. It’s optimized for professional photographers, and it’s hard to learn (because it uses such advanced new concepts), but it’s really fast and easy to use, once learned. I took some classes, and I love it. It does not compete with Photoshop in any way.

Adobe DESPISES it, though - They want all of that pro-photographer business for themselves. Right around the same time that Apple announced Aperture 1.0, Adobe announced Lightroom, which directly competes with Aperture.

Now that I’ve taken the free Lynda.com tutorial for Photoshop CS3 Beta, I can see that Adobe is folding everything in Lightroom into the Adobe Bridge software that works with Photoshop CS3. Bridge is identical-identical-identical in operation to Aperture. Other than the shape of the magnifying glass (square vs. round), Bridge CS3 steals Apple’s ideas, down to the very tiniest details. I mean seriously - It’s time for Apple’s famous lawyers to start filing papers in court. I’m boggled - I haven’t seen such a blatant interface-theft case since Windows 1.01.

Other than that, I haven’t done much hard-core evaluating of Photoshop CS3 Beta’s speed. I’ve been letting other folks do the heavy lifting, so far. It seems to work fine on MY MacBook Pro, but I haven’t got any hard jobs to throw at it, so close to the holidays. I’m also aware that it has all sorts of issues, so I’m in no rush to be on the bleeding edge, quite yet.
I’ll keep y’all posted on any progress that I have made, though. Watch this space for further developments.

Stopping Jokes from Family & Loved Ones

Friday, October 6th, 2006

These people who forward jokes - ARGH!!@!

I’m MERCILESS with people that do that. I say:

“Thank you for expressing love to me by sending me jokes and other
thoughtful items via e-mail. I clearly perceive PLENTY of love
coming through. Now, I’ve reached the point where I simply can’t
handle any more jokes/recipes/political alerts/puppy & kitty pics
from anybody at all, no matter how much I enjoy them. Please remove
me from your e-mail lists, with no hard feelings at all, because I
truly understand how much you care for me!”

Works every time, especially if I keep sending the exact same thing,
over and over.


      ©2008 Tony Lindsey